Five whistleblowing workers at the only NHS transgender clinic in Britain have quit over fears children as young as three are going through unnecessary gender reassignment treatment.
The clinicians from the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic based in London and Leeds left over concerns children were being incorrectly diagnosed with gender dysphoria.
It was feared some gay children struggling with their sexual identity are being incorrectly diagnosed as transgender.
Specialists also worried that some of the youngsters were being referred and pressured into having gender change treatment after suffering homophobic bullying.
All five former staff members were part of the team deciding if youngsters should be given hormone blockers to stop their development before puberty, according to the Times.
The patients then take a course of cross-sex hormones at the age of 16 depending on whether they want to develop as male or female.
At least 18 staff have reportedly quit the controversial clinic over the past three years, citing fears not enough checks are being done to correctly diagnose child patients.
Sex & Circumcision: An American Love Story by Eric Clopper
About four years ago, pathologist Matthew Anderson was examining slices of postmortem brain tissue from an individual with autism under a microscope when he noticed something extremely odd: T cells swarming around a narrow space between blood vessels and neural tissue. The cells were somehow getting through the blood-brain barrier, a wall of cells that separates circulating blood from extracellular fluid, neurons, and other cell types in the central nervous system, explains Anderson, who works at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “I just have seen so many brains that I know that this is not normal.”
He soon identified more T-cell swarms, called lymphocytic cuffs, in a few other postmortem brains of people who had been diagnosed with autism. Not long after that, he started to detect another oddity in the brain tissue — tiny bubbles, or blebs. “I’d never seen them in any other brain tissue that I’ve looked at for many, many different diseases,” he says. Anderson began to wonder whether the neurological features he was observing were specific to autism.
Jennifer Jaynes Cause of Death – USA Today bestselling author who wrote about corruption inside the vaccine industry has passed away. She died on November 25, 2019.
Jennifer Jaynes Cause of Death is Suicide. But we have not been able to verify this yet.
Jennifer Jaynes was born October 30, 1972 in Minot, North Dakota. She graduated from Old Dominion University with a B.S. in Health Sciences and a minor in Management.
In reference to a study, entitled “Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offsprings in Canada”, published in JAMA Pediatrics, the journal editors were stunned by a finding that fluoridated water exposure in mothers during pregnancy reduces the IQ of their sons.
The study found that in boys, a 1 mg/L increase in the maternal urine fluoride concentration led to a 5-point decrease in boys’ IQs.
Dimitri Christakis and Frederick Rivara of JAMA Pediatrics, in a podcast, compare the findings as overturning decades-old presumptions of safety of fluoridated water.
Christakis: “Before they were anti vaxxers, there were sort of anti fluoriders. Right. And like the traditional teaching, when I was going through residency and early in my early professional career was that there was fluoride is completely safe. All these people that are trying to take it out of the water are nuts. It’s the best thing that’s ever happened for children’s dental health. And we just need to push back and get it into every water system.”
Christakis: “In fact, before there were anti-vaxxers, there were, sort-of, anti-fluoriders, and the traditional teaching when I was going through residency was that fluoride was completely safe, all these people that are trying to take it out of the water are nuts, it’s the best thing that ever happened…”
Christakis: “So when I first saw this title, my initial reaction was ‘What the hell?’”
12th century physician and Rabbi Moses Maimonides who advocated for circumcision stated that the purpose of circumcision is to reduce the sexual pleasure and desire of men without preventing the funcions necessary for reproductions. Maimonides stated that the removal of the foreskin reduced a mans lustful thoughts and made sex less pleasurable. He also stated that it was very hard for a woman to give up a lover who was uncircumcised.
quote from Maimonides;
“The bodily injury caused to that organ is exactly that which is desired; it does not interrupt any vital function, nor does it destroy the power of generation. Circumcision simply counteracts excessive lust; for there is no doubt that circumcision weakens the power of sexual excitement, and sometimes lessens the natural enjoyment: the organ necessarily becomes weak when it loses blood and is deprived of its covering from the beginning. Our Sages (Beresh. Rabba, c. 80) say distinctly: It is hard for a woman, with whom an uncircumcised had sexual intercourse, to separate from him. This is, as I believe, the best reason for the commandment concerning circumcision”.
This is backed up by modern studies, A study by K.O’Hara and J.O ‘Hara (1999) showed that women felt more intimate with men who were uncircumcised and also that women felt more sexual pleasure with men who were uncircumcised.
According to the Danish study, Morten Frisch et al. (2011) circumcised men were more likely to have >10 sexual partners compared to uncircumcised men. This means circumcised men have more issues maintaining a monogamous relationship.
This goes perfectly along with the jewish agenda of destroying the natural relationship between men and women and to brake down the family.
A study by Laumann et al. (1997) observed that circumcised men are more likely to engage in homosexual acts and other degenerate sexual acts such as anal compared to uncircumcised men, circumcised men also masturbate more frequently compared to uncircumcised which can also cause issues to a man such as decreased sexual sensitivity and this could also mean that circumcised men are more prone to become addicted to porn if they masturbate more than uncircumcised men.
The British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (2000) reported that circumcised males were more likely to report having a homosexual partner and more likely to have partners from abroad as compared with normal intact males.
“For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner–those who are not your offspring” Genesis 17:12
Jews forcibly circumcised all their gentile slaves to signfy that their bodies belonged to their jewish masters.
According Steven Weitzman in his aricle ”Forced Circumcision and the Shifting Role of Gentiles in Hasmonean Ideology”(1999) in the time of antiquity, circumcision on gentiles could’ve been a way to show jewish power and domination over gentile bodies.
Examples of jews forcing Gentiles to circumcise after beating them in battle; From the historian Ptolemy (1st century BCE) starting with Hasmonean King Hyrcanus I and with his successor continuing the practice:
”They forcibly circumcised all the uncircumcised boys that they found within the borders of Israel”
After the victory of the Maccabees over the Seleucid Empire in which the jews managed to gain sovereignty over Judea. Mattathias forcibly circumcised both jews and non-jews found within the borders of Israel. Prior to this during the rule of Antiochus IV of the Seleucid Empire, circumcision was forbidden and punishable by death which was one of the reasons for the Maccabean Revolt. Hellenes at this time were known for criticizing circumcision viewing it and rightfully so, as genital mutilation..
In Pagan Rome, Judaism was considered a cold religion viewing circumcision as barbarous.
Emperor Hadrian of the Roman Empire viewed circumcision as evil as castration and had made circumcision illegal and punishable by death but under his uccessor Antoninus Pius, it was allowed again but only for jews and not gentiles.
Source: ”The Jewish Quarterly Review, Vol. 59, No. 2 (Oct., 1968), pp. 93-117”
Romans had also made circumcision illegal in the territories they took over in the 3rd century;
Source: ”The beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions p 109”- Lena Salaymeh
According to Visigothic canon, the jews were not allowed to hold any public office or have any authority over Christians and one of the main reasons for this was the pure malice jews had over Christians (or just gentiles). They were seen as a greater threat than pagans and heretics.
Visigoths knew this by seeing how jews barbarically treated their gentile slaves, one of the barbaric acts cited by Visigothic canons was; forced circumcision.
In the Visigothic kingdom, Circumcision was considered a great threat and since the Third Council of Toledo (589) to year 624 had been included as a reason for every anti-jewish provision implemented by the Visigoths.
Source: ”Jews in Early Christian Law: Byzantium and the Latin West, 6th-11th centuries”- John Tolan et al. Oct 2011
Visigoths detested circumcision so much that they forbade circumcision to all jews. During the reign of Recceswinth he forbade circumcision to all jews, no matter if they were baptized or not, and if they did not comply they would recieve the death penalty by being stoned to death or burned at the stake, however if circumcised man was a gentile slave, her would recieve his freedom but if the slave was jewish he would recieve the death penalty anyway. During the rule king Erwig discouraged the evil practiced through confiscation of possessions and the amputation of the male organ. Other kings of the Visigoths had taken similar actions to stop circumcision.
Source; The Visigoths: Studies in Culture and Society p.132 by Alberto Ferreiro.
Today, there are well over 100 doctors in the United States who perform sexual reassignment surgery, according to TransHealthCare. But at one point, that number was more like…three.
Two of those worked with Christine Jorgensen, who is often credited as the first recipient of such surgery. She had to go to Denmark to begin treatment, but returned stateside in 1953 as a blond vamp. Becoming a nightclub singer and TV star with a Lauren Bacall fashion sense, she was an international sensation. But it turns out she was not the first person to have her sex reassigned.
Sex reassignment surgery had an earlier life, in an unexpected time and place: 1920s Germany. Several doctors there performed such surgeries using analog technology and organic hormones. They worked under a new paradigm: What if they could make someone’s body fit their mind instead of forcing their mind to fit their body?
“Sex-change surgery did not take root…because of new or unusual medical technology,” writes Yale professor Joanne Meyerowitz in her 2002 book How Sex Changed. “It took root because Germany had a vocal campaign for sexual emancipation.”
. . . .
There are also accounts of transplanting ape testicles into men, womb insertion, and voluntary castration. Constructed vaginal openings, done with rudimentary painkillers, bordered on the macabre.
But Hirschfeld took a different route. The Stonewall Society refers to him as part educator and part “father-confessor” who claimed to have discussed homosexuality and transsexual issues with over 30,000 people. He understood surgery as a promising field in the portfolio of sex studies, not as a new practice with which he could make his name.
Hirschfeld saw himself as an activist, constantly referring to a motto of “justice through science.”—which also made him a target of Germany’s rising far right. In 1921, he was jumped after a lecture and left for dead on the street.
He persisted, though, and became an intermediary between the German government and the trans community. One story tells of a trans woman who was arrested on counts of female impersonation. The judge contacted Hirschfeld, who consulted with the woman. She requested and received reassignment surgery, and later worked in Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science.
Two of Hirschfeld’s colleagues performed numerous reassignments and began to realize that their patients tended to be wealthy Germans. They publicized their surgeries in newspapers, hoping poorer trans people could learn about the procedures and get in touch.
By the early 1930s, people came from around the world to undergo reassignment surgery in Berlin. Then Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany in January 1931. Two years later, his brownshirts broke into Hirschfeld’s institute and burned his journals and research. When Hirschfeld was out of Germany on tour, the Nazi student group marched on the Institute. Over 20,000 books were set aflame, as well as medical diagrams and photographs crucial to understanding sex reassignment surgery. Hirschfeld and his colleagues were Jewish, but it wasn’t just that. Hitler also publicly raged against the “vice” of homosexuality and the “degenerate” lives of transsexuals. They weakened the Aryan cause.
The patients were largely saved from targeting by the Nazis by the fact that the documentation of their procedures went up in smoke, but the trans community’s Great Library of Alexandria was burned, and the medical research was pushed back decades.
An Israeli Boeing-747 returned from Nepal to Israel’s Ben Gurion International Airport on Tuesday afternoon, and among its 229 passengers were 15 Israeli babies, all born within the past six weeks to surrogate mothers in Nepal.
Some of the babies were with their Israeli parents and others were cared for by Israeli passengers. None of the surrogate mothers were allowed to travel.
The infants’ arrival completed the evacuation of 26 surrogate Israeli babies from Nepal, where a devastating earthquake on Saturday killed more than 4,000. The rescue process, coupled with widely published photos of the newborns being cradled by Israeli medics on the Tel Aviv tarmac, has thrust Israel’s reliance on Nepalese surrogates into the spotlight, revealing a little known link between Nepal and Israel and starting a debate here about the ethics of international surrogacy. . . .
Only heterosexual couples can easily employ surrogate mothers in Israel. Gay couples and single parents tend to look abroad to bear children with surrogates. For many years, India — where costs are low but the standard of medical care is generally high — was the preferred surrogacy option for Israelis, but a change to the law there in 2013 prevented gay men and couples who had been married for less than two years from engaging surrogate mothers. The shift in the law caught many Israelis midway through the surrogacy process. The Indian women traveled to Nepal to give birth and the Israeli surrogacy agencies then switched their operations from India to Nepal. . . .
Many Asian and European countries ban commercial surrogacy, and it can cost up to $150,000 in the U.S. and Canada but only $30,000 in Nepal. . . .