Remember: The left only became a tolerance cult after they’d ridiculed and desecrated family, church, nation. Seems just yesterday, the left burned flags and urinated/defecated on symbols of Christendom and congratulated itself as a bold champion of free speech.
Author Archives: admin
Prosecutors said he bought the organs from vulnerable people in Israel for as little as $10,000
Prosecutors said he bought the organs from vulnerable people in Israel for as little as $10,000
CNN: “Sherelle Smith condemned the violence” Sherelle Smith: “Burn Down White People’s Stuff”
CNN: “Sherelle Smith condemned the violence”
Sherelle Smith: “Burn Down White People’s Stuff”
Milwaukee Riot – Black People Targeting Whites – “They’re White! Beat
They are acting on the ideology created by Jesse Benn, Tim Wise, Noel Ignatiev and others.
One of the best ideologies for getting disparate people to cooperate has historically been Christianity. Unfortunately, the left hates Christianity even more than they hate white people.
“I was born to have babies”: U.S. Olympian sparks feminist outrage
Leftists throw women under the bus just like they threw the working class under the bus.
Anything to destroy the social order. Leftists throw women under the bus just like they threw the working class under the bus. Gays too.
Example:
Swedish Prof: Hot Weather, Not Rapey Migrants Driving Sweden’s Place As The Rape Capital Of The World
The Self-Loathing of the European Left
Pan-Africanism and Weak vs Strong Ideologies
Pan-Africanism.
Can we sort ideologies between those justifying the strong (“right wing” / imposing karma / marketplace for competition), and those justifying the weak (“left wing” / demand sharing / not leaving anyone behind).
Why is it that the ideologies that justify the weak always attempt to deny and destroy heritage?
From economic Marxism to cultural Marxism to Pan-Africanism. What is it about appealing to the weak that requires the left to destroy everyone’s heritage?
friend of mine:
—“Execution of Americo-Liberians (descendants of freed American Slaves) who imposed tyrany and slavery on the autochonous groups in Liberia.
Pan-africanists have never learned from this brutal lesson. You may read the histories of modern west Africa and nevrr learn why the seria leonians and Liberians fought brutal civil wars.”—
Tax subsidized terrorism
WSJ: “welfare is abused by Muslims across Europe — some 80% of Muslim immigrants to Europe are on the dole, and more than half are “economically inactive.” Muslims claim disability more than any other group. In the EU capital of Belgium, as well as neighboring Netherlands, Muslims are roughly 5% of the population yet consume 40% to 60% of the welfare budget. Belgium spends more on unemployment benefits than any other country outside Denmark. European society isn’t oppressing Muslim immigrants. Far from it. It’s coddling them.”
Clinton Foundation Economist: Hugo Chavez’s economic miracle
Two Veterans Perform Citizens Arrest on Entire County Board, They Laugh Until Sheriff Shows Up
1. God bless America.
2. People who risk their lives return with a sense of ownership.
3. Every man a sheriff.
Even Google knows about slavery in Mauritania
Did blacks sell blacks?
Did blacks sell blacks?
Answer: yes.
I will give you a truly remarkable example.
In the 1930s the True Whig Party – a party composed almost exclusively of the descendants of freed American slaves – sold hundreds of Africans to the island of Fernando Po. They also voted to reinstitute the institution of forced (indentured) labour.
This was more than a century after the abolition of slavery in England.
Let that sink in.
Alleged FBI insider on 4Chan
Saudi Arabia visits and donations to the CF. Russian Uranium fiasco. HRC and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.
…
All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason.
…
Soros funds, instructs, and influences every layer of US government. right down to the tax code.
Correct theories: Huge Jewish influence, Soros as a puppet master, red team planner. You would have to ask specifically.
…
>Also, what fears would need to be resolved in order for the FBI to be willing to go nuclear on this bitch and the foundation?
This would be like launching a nuke at NYC. We would hit the target, but we would then be at war with the whole US.
The FBI is facing the entire federal government in this case. It is why we are so quiet.
endingthefed.com/fbi-insider-leaks-all-clinton-foundation-exposed-involves-entire-us-government.html
The More Chores A Husband Does, The More Likely The Marriage Will End In Divorce
Couples may be better off living in a “traditional” household where women do all the housework if they want to stay together, according to a report from the Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science.
Norwegian researchers were interested to see how married and cohabiting men and women divided housework and childcare throughout various life stages. They analyzed two separate studies involving nearly 20,000 men and women aged 18 to 79: the study of Life Course, Generation and Gender, and the study of the Norwegian Life Course, Ageing, and Generations. Participants respectively answered questions about the division of housework and childcare; their attitudes toward gender equality; as well as other variables like life stage and social class.
The results showed 65 percent of couples equally or near-equally divided childcare, but not housework: Women reported doing all or almost all of the work in 11 percent of couples and “somewhat more of the work” in 60 percent of couples. About 25 percent of couples divided the work more equally, with younger couples, childless couples, and couples where the woman had a full-time job among those more likely to split domestic chores.
Researchers did not find an association between a traditional share of housework (women do most of the work) and a lower risk of divorce — but they did report untraditional couples had a greater risk for divorce. Men who did as much or more of the housework were more likely to get divorced than couples where the woman did most of the housework over a period of four years.
“The more a man does in the home, the higher the divorce rate,” said Thomas Hansen, co-author of the study entitled “Gender Equality At Home,” according to AFP. While researchers found no or very little cause-and-effect, they believe that the observation could be due to “modern” attitudes.
www.medicaldaily.com/more-chores-husband-does-more-likely-marriage-will-end-divorce-242815



