Bush has laid legal groundwork for dictatorial powers which he might assume in the event of a very loosely defined “national emergency.”
(Video Here)
If we had a free press, we’d know more about this.
define( 'DB_CHARSET', 'utf8mb4' ); define( 'DB_COLLATE', 'utf8mb4_unicode_ci' );
". . . a republic, if you can keep it."
Bush has laid legal groundwork for dictatorial powers which he might assume in the event of a very loosely defined “national emergency.”
(Video Here)
If we had a free press, we’d know more about this.
do you know if there’ve been any further developments? it’s very hard for me to wrap my mind around such a “directive” being remotely legal.
I don’t know. Wouldn’t it be great if the media were addressing these obvious concerns?
thought you might be interested: slate is attempting to address it.
www.slate.com/id/2176185/nav/tap3/