4 comments

  1. Does Ron Paul hold exactly the same views he did
    when he was 30 years old? Similar maybe, but he
    has evolved and expressed himself.

    During the intervening years many grew up with
    televisions sets. If you did not like the program,
    you just changed the channel. Not much work. And
    for many there were enough TV sets so that no
    effort or skills were involved in getting consensus.

    But in a room full of people from different sections
    of town, how is mutual agreement on which channel
    to watch arrived at? How is that agreement reached
    without animosity?

    Then today we have those influenced by the TV training
    wanting immediate correction to what is perceived as
    wrong.

    The foreign exploits of the US over the years have
    exposed many to how thing work elsewhere as compared
    with USA. They ask why was I sent here.

    Not getting the quick fix answer to their inquiry
    they become agitated. Others exposed to violence
    and corruption become morose some of which is
    attributed to post combat syndrome. And some
    are aggitated and morose.

    They do not grasp that they are spreading a
    negative and gloomy message.

    In times of trouble those that can find a positive
    thought and express that message are sought.
    While we all cannot ever agree on what that
    positive message is, it is that message that has
    moved mankind to better things.

    Early in human development the Ten Commandments
    demonstrated a positive direction. Therein, we find
    a commandment not to lie, not to steal, and more.

    An observant analysis shows that humans who
    work to better themselves resent their efforts being
    stolen away by force. When that stealing comes under
    the guise of government they resent that government.

    In recorded recent history we have seen how
    Marxism steals the work product of workers. That
    has resulted in the stifling of effort to produce by
    workers. That has resulted in morbid morass of
    frustrated people.

    Herein we see the efforts of a young man frustration
    accepting the current morbid situation. He has given
    up on seeking higher ground. At least to the observer,
    it appears that he accepts the morass as unfixable,
    rather than leading his contemporaries around the
    problem to greater achievements.

    The question is how to inspire the young, energetic, and
    able to recognize that they are needed to move mountains.
    How to get them to lead?

    Leaders are not born. How do we light the fire in the lamp of
    leadership?

    Ed K

  2. Here we have good example of seeing one
    tree in a forest.

    The bigger tree is the question of how do light the
    fire of achievement in the saplings?

    This part of question was dismissed, again.

    How do we get the race horse blinders off those
    capable of positive achievement. Evil or wrong headed
    people have no problem in trying to dominate.

    How do we get those who believe in freedom to
    have fire in the belly? How do we get good young
    people to step up and fight “Darth Vader”?

    How do we get away from comments such as one
    person cannot change anything?

    While it is good to look at Ron Paul and the fact that
    he has brought important topics out into discussion,
    how to we persuade young believers to step forward
    and impliment some of his ideas?

    How do we light the fire in their bellies to lead?

    How do we get those capable to ‘work’ that is train themselves to be persuasive and develop a command presence to counteract all the “Darth Vader” acolytes?

    Ed K

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*