U.S. Attacks Iran Via CIA-Funded Jundullah Terror Group

The U.S. government effectively attacked Iran yesterday after its proxy terror group Jundullah launched a suicide bomb attack against the Iranian Revolutionary Guard at their headquarters in Pishin, near the border with Pakistan.

Leaders of the Al-Qaeda affiliated Sunni terrorist group Jundullah have claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing in Iran that killed over 40 people yesterday. The group is funded and trained by the CIA and is being used to destabilize the government of Iran, according to reports out of the London Telegraph and ABC News. (Read more from prisonplanet.com)

See Also: Seymour Hersh On Covert Operations In Iran

Critique of Bill Moyers Show

I’m a long-time fan of Bill Moyers, but I think he’s been completely off the mark on economics. I posted the comments below on his website. After a couple hours, they vanished.



0:00 – Don’t even get me started about Michael Moore’s movie. He blames Capitalism for government bailouts of wall street, even though that’s the opposite of capitalism. Then he tries to make a point for socialism at the end without providing any support for it, or acknowledging the ruin it has sowed all over the world.

4:15 – SIMON JOHNSON: Remember Wall Street convinced us that trading derivatives without any regulation, that all these kind of crazy housing loans, which are very dangerous for consumers. That all of this was sensible. All of this was a good way to sustain growth.

My reaction: Trading derivatives would not have been a problem if the traders were allowed to fail. GOVERNMENT did not let anyone fail. That’s why there was recklessness. We don’t need more regulation. We need to let irresponsible people fail. The example of “crazy housing loans” is even more glaring. GOVERNMENT REQUIRED BANKS to hold a certain portion of bad loans, mostly in minority neighborhood. REQUIRED! Also, almost all loans were subsidized by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. These institution were run by government regulators – thousands of them working forty hours of week. It is government intervention that failed, not a lack of regulation.

4:45 – BILL MOYERS: ‘Does this crisis reflect something about the disproportionate influence of a few incompetent investment bankers or a deeper breakdown of capitalism?’

This is not capitalism. It’s socialism for the rich.

6:10 – SIMON JOHNSON: . . . the Obama Administration has is leaning in a better direction.

WTF? Obama, Bush W., McCain were all unanimous is supporting the bank bailouts. Obama is running the biggest deficit in history, he’s appointing the same banksters to top jobs, and he’s ignoring the most important opportunity for ‘change’ which is Ron Paul’s bill to audit the Federal Reserve.

7:30 – MARCY KAPTUR: [story about JP Morgan Chase]

Instead of encouraging people to break the law, how about encouraging Congress to STOP GIVING JP MORGAN OUR MONEY.

12:00 – MARCY KAPTUR: . . . And we know the basic rules of economics. Housing leads us to recovery. Housing was the precipitating factor in this economic downturn. Unless you dealing with the housing sector, you aren’t going to have growth in this economy.

This statement is nonsense.

12:30 – SIMON JOHNSON: This is capitalism, Bill.

No, it’s not.

15:00 – PRESIDENT OBAMA: . . . Those on Wall Street cannot resume taking risks without regard for consequences, and expect that next time, American taxpayers will be there to break their fall.

You should not have given them MY money to begin with.

16:30 – MARCY KAPTUR: . . . with the largest financial crisis in American history, in the largest transfer of wealth from the American people to the biggest banks in this country, that every committee of Congress would be involved in hearings, that this would be on the news, that people would be engaged in this. What we’re seeing is– tangential hearings on very arcane aspects of financial reform . . . rather than hearings on the fundamental new architecture of reforming the American financial system, so that we have prudent lending, capital accumulation at the local level again; that we encourage savings and limit debt by the American people. Our country needs this. Those aren’t the hearings that are happening.

I don’t doubt her sincerity but I doubt her understanding. This conversation seems almost irresponsible with it’s non-mention of the money printing federal reserve. If she wants to encourage savings, stop printing money (end the fed), so that the purchasing power of somebody’s savings will be preserved. If she wants to limit debt, stop printing money (end the fed).

To me this interview seems like a “tangential hearing on a very arcane aspect” of the financial crisis.

17:15 – MARCY KAPTUR: If you want a marker at the Federal level of how serious we are to get justice out of this financial crisis, look at the F.B.I. Look at the number of people who are really prosecuting and investigation mortgage fraud and securities fraud. It is so small . . . And until those numbers increase, we will not begin to get justice.

Much easier (and cheaper) than prosecuting people is simply letting them face the consequences of their irresponsibility. Stop subsidizing bad loan, stop bailing out corrupt banks.

21:00 – MARCY KAPTUR: . . . When they messed up during the 1980s, they put their bill through the savings and loans crisis on the American people. $140 billion. . . . But that, you know, it opened the flood gates. They go, ‘Oh, we can get away with $140 billion?’ This time how many trillions have they gotten away with?

Here the conversation swing sooooooo close to the truth. The next sentence should be “We need to stop bailing them out,” or “The problem is government involvement,” or, “If we only let people fail . . .” Instead, the next sentence is a call for more government.

25:30 – MARCY KAPTUR: [discussion of cover contracts with the Federal Reserve]

Say the words, Congresswoman. END THE FED. or, at least AUDIT THE FED. SAY IT, Dammit!

27:30 – MARCY KAPTUR: [talks about restricting fundraising]

If government wasn’t controlling everything, industry wouldn’t need to lobby.

In general, this discussion is grossly incomplete. It completely ignores the federal reserve, and the cause of the financial crisis. The crisis was not cause by corrupt banks, although they certainly had a lot to do with it. The crisis was caused by artificially low interest rates set by the Federal Reserve which flooded the world with cheap money and created an unsustainable boom. This is the Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle with has predicted this and many other crashes caused by artificially low interest rates. It is almost universally ignored by governments and media.

Jim Rogers on letting people fail, and why we don’t need even more regulation:

Hasbarats – Israel’s professional pseudo-grass-roots propagandists – fail at Toronto Film Festival

Ilan Shturman, deputy director of the Israeli foreign ministry’s hasbara department (!), told an Israeli business newspaper in July that US$150,000 had been allocated for the first stage of a campaign to seed the Internet with hasbarats:

“Our people will not say: ‘Hello, I am from the hasbara department of the Israeli foreign ministry and I want to tell you the following.’ Nor will they necessarily identify themselves as Israelis. They will speak as net-surfers and as citizens, and will write responses that will look personal but will be based on a prepared list of messages that the foreign ministry developed.”

. . . .

In January, Amir Gissin, Israel’s consul-general in Toronto, sent out a hasbara recruitment letter, which read in part: “If you are frustrated or concerned with the portrayal of Israel in Canadian News and with biased [sic] depictions, your voice can be heard. Now, think that you’re not alone 10,000 voices like yours can respond every day: praise, protest, inform, correct on leading Canadian news websites, in real time, effectively.”

The weakness with this tactic, as you probably figured out, is that hasbarats will inevitably shout and whine themselves into irrelevance. Eventually, intelligent people will tune out the zionist boilerplate, the anti-Muslim smears, and the interminable drone about the holocaust. Already, the once-dreaded epithet “anti-Semite” has lost all significance, as if it ever had any, and the person who hurled it is more likely to be mocked than feared.

. . . .

This tactic was tried at the recent Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) as Tel Aviv was spotlighted in a City-to-City program with Toronto. The ostensible purpose was to use an apolitical, cultural event to obscure the tyranny that Tel Aviv represents, but more than 1,000 filmmakers and performers, weren’t fooled. They put their names to The Toronto Declaration: No Celebration of Occupation, an open letter to the TIFF that protested the co-optation of the festival by the Israeli propaganda machine.

The protest accomplished precisely what the hasbarats tried to prevent. “Rather than talking about Israel’s rich cinematic culture, the buzz this week in Toronto has centered on the one thing Israeli officials had sought to avoid: the conflict with the Palestinians,” reported the Jewish Telegraph Agency.

Another major defeat for Israel came courtesy of Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert. After offering a knee-jerk condemnation of the City-to-City protests, he reversed himself the next day:

“I wasn’t prepared with enough facts about the events leading up to the Festival’s decision to showcase Tel Aviv in the City-to-City section. I [initially] thought of it as an innocent goodwill gesture, but now realize it was part of a deliberate plan to ‘re-brand’ Israel in Toronto, as a pilot for a larger such program. The Festival should never have agreed to be used like this. It was naïve for the plan’s supporters to believe it would have the effect they hoped for.”

. . . .

According to the authors of the Toronto Declaration:

“Many Palestinian artists and filmmakers, denied freedom of movement by Israel’s Occupation and pass system, are de facto boycotted, unable to communicate with their communities or travel freely. The double standard is mind-boggling and, slowly, these are the issues we are helping to put under a spotlight.”

Finally, it is important to note that the Declaration’s authors succeeded without any media help. They had no money to place ads, and no newspaper would publish their open letter. On the other hand, hasbarats had the full support (read: “obedience”) of Canada’s national media, and lost.

If a modest, unfunded, popular protest can effectively defeat an orchestrated propaganda campaign, what does that say about Israel’s ability to pose as a legitimate, democratic state? (Read more from usa.mediamonitors.net)