“The headline, Peter Schiff FCIC is a sham” is typical main steam media gobbledegook. A better reference would be to read the dissenting statement by Peter J. Wallison and Arthur F. Burns. That is a good analytical report. It is over 500 pages of discussion:
It makes comprehensible reading and good explanations.
Sometimes you have to get down and dirty and read the fine print and study the details. Just pandering to emotional hot buttons does not add value to understanding.
“The headline, Peter Schiff FCIC is a sham” is typical main steam media gobbledegook. A better reference would be to read the dissenting statement by Peter J. Wallison and Arthur F. Burns. That is a good analytical report. It is over 500 pages of discussion:
c0182732.cdn1.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/fcic_final_report_wallison_dissent.pdf
It makes comprehensible reading and good explanations.
Sometimes you have to get down and dirty and read the fine print and study the details. Just pandering to emotional hot buttons does not add value to understanding.
Ed K