Monthly Archives: April 2016
Justin Trudeau: “If you kill your enemies, they win.”
Modern Education: “You are a racist.”
Curt on the definition of a Racist
My definition of a racist is someone who criticizes others for following their group evolutionary strategy instead of improving his own group evolutionary strategy. In other words asking others to pay for his defense – a fraud.
I acknowledge only differences in class distribution, institutions, religion, traditions, norms as impediments to cooperation.
I see no reason why all races cannot transcend the beast and evolve into man, and for man to the gods we envision.
I view multiculturalism as nothing more than conquest of the aristocratic people’s by the non.
Any man who will fight for Liberty with me is my brother. I may prefer we marry within our kin. But this is an aesthetic statement only.
Actually, Raising Beef Is Good for the Planet
This article focuses on the ways that grass-fed cattle are part of an eco-system that fertilizes soil and restores carbon into soil, and requires grassland with fights erosion.
www.wsj.com/articles/actually-raising-beef-is-good-for-the-planet-1419030738
I’ve encountered an even stronger argument that agriculture is much more devastating to local ecosystems than free-range cattle, but I can’t for the life of me find the article. It was also authored by a former believer who’d converted. I think it focused on Australia.
Thomas Sowell on White Slavery
Wall Street Contribution by Presidential Candidate
Feminist Chose Islam
Michelle Fields, history of lying
Research: Human friendships based on genetic similarities beyond the superficial
Friends often look alike. The tendency of people to forge friendships with people of a similar appearance has been noted since the time of Plato. But now there is research suggesting that, to a striking degree, we tend to pick friends who are genetically similar to us in ways that go beyond superficial features.
For example, you and your friends are likely to share certain genes associated with the sense of smell.
Our friends are as similar to us genetically as you’d expect fourth cousins to be, according to the study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This means that the number of genetic markers shared by two friends is akin to what would be expected if they had the same great-great-great-grandparents.
Haille Mariam-Lemar on Thucydides
(note to myself for future reference)
Several years ago, before I discovered Popper, I read Thucydides and his account of the Peloponnesian War. After about 150 pages of reading I began to despise the Athenians deeply. However it had not occurred to me that my feelings were being manipulated by the omissions of a long dead author. However one day I picked up the Open Society and its Enemies and in that book I discovered that Thucydides was an anti-democrat belonging to the autocratic faction of the Athenian Aristocracy. With this insight came a greater appreciation of the text. Whilst reading Thucydides i had ignored all the hints that he was a rabid anti-democrat and that with the spartans he had actively conspired to destroy the greatest civilization ever to emerge in the Peloponnese
***
The Spartans unlike the athenians left virtually nothing. Their cities were like villages, decrepit and disorganised. All they were good for was war and the yearly pogrom of slaves. They also opposed free trade and bNned their nobles from owning gold. In effect they were proto-totalitarians who were only good at breeding armed sociopaths. When the Persians came, they allied with them to defeat their kinsmen. They then imposed an autocracy on Athens which lasted a few years before it was destroyed. Plato, as you may know was a member (admirer) of the anti-democratic athenian faction. His Republic is a mirror of the Spartan “Constitution” although in this case, the ruler is a philosopher such as Plato aspired to be.
***
Roman, the man was a rabid anti-democrat with strong oligarchical inclinations. One of the best works out there is
A.H.M. Jones’, ‘The Athenian democracy and its critics’, Cambridge Historical
Journey. 11.1 (1953), 1-26.
Shock as 84 schools have NO white British pupils at all… double the number of five years ago
Wackjob Commies CRASH “Students For Trump” Meeting
After Anal Rape, Left Wing Activist Felt ‘Guilt And Responsibility’ His Migrant Attacker Was Deported
It’s a mental disorder:
An active member of the Norwegian Socialist Left Party (SV) who described himself as an ardent “feminist and anti-racist” explained the difficulty he experienced accepting that he had been anally raped by a male migrant. He said he didn’t blame the man for the attack, and regretted the fact he had been sent back to Somalia.
Ritualized Human Sacrifices helped cement societal hierarchies
I can’t tell if this is stating the obvious or not:
The ancients could kill you in a million different ways and give you a million different reasons why it needed to be done. In much of the pre-modern world, ritual sacrifice was framed as necessary for the good of the society at large — the only way to guarantee, say, a plentiful harvest or success in war.
But the priests and rulers who sanctioned such killings may have had another motive, a new study suggests. An analysis of more than seven dozen Austronesian cultures revealed that the practice of human sacrifices tended to make societies increasingly less egalitarian and eventually gave rise to strict, inherited class systems. In other words, ritual killings helped keep the powerful in power and everyone else in check.
That finding might seem intuitive — societies in which some members are habitually killed probably value certain lives over others — but it has broader implications, the researchers said in the journal Nature. It suggests a “darker link between religion and the evolution of modern hierarchical societies,” they write, in which “ritual killings helped humans transition from the small egalitarian groups of our ancestors and the large, stratified societies we live in today.”