While some Americans assume this is a “Arab affair”, the fact is that Egypt’s president Mubarak is a yes-man to the U.S., and the fall of the Tunisian and now Egyptian leaders are really the ouster of U.S. puppet regimes in the Middle East.
. . .
Mainstream Islamist parties in the Mideast have nothing to do with al-Qaida (which barely exists any more) or anti-Western programs. Their primary concern is getting rid of the western-backed oligarchies that keep the Muslim world backwards and in thrall. Their platform is sharing resource wealth, social welfare, education, uprooting thieving oligarchies and fighting endemic corruption.
The big question now is will Tunisia’s dramatic events be a harbinger of other explosions across the volatile Arab world? All eyes are on Egypt, the home of a third of all Arabs. Egypt’s 83-year-old military ruler, Husni Mubarak, is a giant version of Tunisia’s Gen. Ben Ali.
Mubarak was engineered into power by the US after the killing of longtime CIA “asset” Anwar Sadat. Gen. Mubarak has ruled Egypt like a modern-day pharaoh ever since, crushing both violent extremist and legitimate political opposition. Mubarak’s rigged elections, winked at by Washington, are every bit as egregious as Tunisia’s.
So could the flames of Tunisia’s revolution spread to Egypt?
Today, we got the answer.
(Read more from washingtonsblog.com)
So what is the alternative? Let me look at history. At one time there was a Czar in Russia. Turmoil deposed him. Chaos ensued.
In one area of the Czarist Empire, some sought freedom and their own government. What happened? The New Socialist Empire won and what happened? What is referred to as the Holodomor happened? Which was more evil, the Czar or the Soviets?
So ask what will replace the government in Tunisia and Egypt? Do not expect something like the United States that only happened one time in history.
Consider in the chaos and what will happen? Islamist that cut off dissenters and boil kids take power? Analyze the situation with attention to details, alternatives and history.
I don’t think taking money from Americans (by force) and giving it to tyrannical regimes abroad helps. I would say the alternative is non-intervention, as advocated by George Washington & company.