Daily Archives: 6 February 2009

Free Book: The Lie Behind the Lie Detector

“Every year, thousands of law-abiding Americans submit to polygraphic interrogation. And every year, hundreds – if not thousands – are falsely accused based on polygraph chart readings and are routinely denied due process.”

“We wrote this short book to call public attention to the dangers of polygraphy and to protect the innocent from polygraph abuse. Because of our government’s reliance on this pseudoscientific procedure, thousands of truthful persons have been falsely accused of deception and suffered serious adverse consequences. On the other hand, deceptive persons can easily defeat polygraph ‘tests’ through countermeasures, as did convicted spy Aldrich H. Ames.

In this book, you will learn the little-known truth about polygraphy. You will learn:
– that polygraphy is not science (p. 18 ff.);
– that polygraphy, like phrenology and graphology, is without scientific validity (p. 18 ff.);
– that our Government’s reliance on unreliable polygraphy serves to protect spies, undermining – not enhancing – our national security (p. 35 ff.);
– that polygraph “tests” are actually interrogations (pp. 20, 129 ff.);
– that polygraphy depends on your polygrapher lying to and deceiving you (p. 86 ff.);
– the simplistic method by which your polygrapher decides whether you are truthful or deceptive (p. 98 ff.);
– that polygraphy is biased against the truthful (p. 99);
– that polygraph “testing” can be (and has been) easily defeated through countermeasures (p. 22);
– how to protect yourself against a false positive outcome (p. 121 ff);
– how to recognize interrogation tactics and not be fooled by them (p. 112 and p. 129 ff.);
– what to do if you have been falsely accused (p. 164 ff.);
– how you can help put an end to polygraph abuse (p. 171 ff.);
– where to learn more about polygraphy (p. 200 ff.).

If you face an upcoming polygraph “test” and need to learn what to expect as quickly as possible, you may wish to proceed directly to Chapters 3 and 4 (p. 86 ff.) and come back to Chapters 1, 2 and 5 later.”

Get the FREE book here: The Lie Behind the Lie Detector 4th ed. (.pdf), or visit antipolygraph.org.

Google cranks up the Consensus Engine

“Google this week admitted that its staff will pick and choose what appears in its search results. It’s a historic statement – and nobody has yet grasped its significance.

Not so very long ago, Google disclaimed responsibility for its search results by explaining that these were chosen by a computer algorithm. The disclaimer lives on at Google News, where we are assured that:

The selection and placement of stories on this page were determined automatically by a computer program.

” (Read more from andreworlowski.com)

See Also:
Google ready to pursue its agenda in Washington Its employees supported Obama, and four Googlers served on his transition team. Now the Internet giant hopes to win support for network neutrality and expanding high-speed Internet access. (Read more from latimes.com)

The Goldman Sachs “secret handshake”

“My antennas first started twitching when Timothy Geithner was first nominated for the position of Secretary of Treasury. Those of you who have read my previous posts may remember Tim as the former President of the New York Fed, and also as a member of the Group of Thirty (G-30). I wrote an article that detailed the power of the New York Fed, and noted that the Chairman of the Board, Stephen Friedman, is a GS capo. I failed to mention in that article the name of the President of the NY Fed, but by now everyone is familiar with Mr. Geithner. I made the point that the NY Fed was effectively under the control of the GS gangstas.

As if to prove my point, no sooner does Tiny Tim [Notice the resemblance? I wonder if he can play “Tiptoe through the Tulips” on the ukelele?] become Treas-Sec of the US than he appoints a GS insider to be his Chief of Staff. This might have gone unnoticed outside Washington circles except that the person in question, Mark Patterson, was not just any GS lackey. No, he was a high-profile lobbyist for GS. Which led to questions about the Obama pledge to reduce the influence of lobbyists in his administration. Not to worry because Tim has got this one covered.” (Read more from futurenewstoday.blogspot.com)