I think property rights and rule of law are virutes.
Intervention on behalf of property rights are rule of law are good things.
Non-intervention alone is not a good thing. It has become so in the parlance of many libertarians because the US gov’t intervention often goes hand in hand with violations of property rights / rule of law. But non-intervention should never be considered a virtue in itself. That is suicide.
Many libertarians have what I consider to be a very feminine / gossiping / shaming / beta male conception of property. They think it is “natural”, and everyone who violates property can be shamed into behaving more “naturally”.
This is childish and naive.
The grownup version of libertarianism is this: you get property when you can punish everyone who would violate property.
Libertarians who ignore the cost of doing this are attempting to free ride — to purchase their liberty as a discount.
Mutual insurance seems like the best chance at establishing liberty.
I pledge to intervene on your behalf (in support of property and rule of law), if you pledge to intervene on mine.