Wertham’s major works, Seduction of the Innocent, Dark Legend, Show of Violence, Sign for Cain, and Circle of Guilt, are represented by research notes, drafts, and related materials documenting the entire creative process. Wertham wrote more than a hundred articles and essays ons ubjects such as battered children, violence in comic books, movies, and television, the problems of parenting, juvenile delinquency, the Vietnam War, the mass media, and sex crimes.
On September 8, 1935, Weiss confronted and shot Huey Long in the Capitol building in Baton Rouge. Weiss was cornered and killed by Long’s bodyguards, being shot sixty-one times. In an unusual public response, thousands attended his funeral.
Weiss was born in Baton Rouge to Carl Adam Weiss, M.D., and the former Viola Maine. His family was Jewish.
In terms of foreign policy, Long was a firm isolationist. He argued that the United States involvement in the Spanish–American War and the First World War had been deadly mistakes conducted on behalf of Wall Street. He also opposed American entry into the World Court, the international court attached to the League of Nations.
Policy on Federal Reserve & Communism:
Long was a staunch opponent of the Federal Reserve System and Communism. Long was smeared for these particular policies. Roosevelt referred to Long as a “Hitler-type” politician. It Can’t Happen Here, a satirical 1935 political novel by American author Sinclair Lewis, portrays Long as a Nazi.
Yesterday evening I wrote about a new version of hypocrisy of Polish history , especially that during WWII.
(at the suggestion of @ Kralizek I throw in so that more people see, this time with the extended description)
Well, on the English-language version (it is not known if in other languages, e.g. German) of Wikipedia, in the slogans about Jews who collaborated with the German occupier on Polish soil, the information disappears that they were Jews, and remain and / or change to Polish nationality.
According to some Wikipedia administrators, there were no Jewish executioners and collaborators during WWII
And so yesterday, for example, there was a fierce fight for editing on the English wiki the entry about Chaim Rumkowski (owner: Chaim Mordechaj Rumkowski – typically Polish names ;-)) – a Jew born in the Soviet Union, who was assigned Polish nationality and roots. “Jewish” has been removed from the password about this creature, “Polish” has been left. Rumkowski, a Jew who collaborated with the Germans during World War II, was the head of the Judenrat – a Jewish organization founded by the Germans, closely collaborating with Germany. Exceptional channel, Lord of Life and Death, although there will be titles such as Gazeta ̶Ż̶y̶d̶o̶w̶s̶k̶a̶ Wyborcza, who will write articles wondering whether Rumkowski “Kat or savior?”. It is estimated that Chaim Rumkowski , a Jew, sent 20,000 people to death . Mostly older people and children. There will also be people like the Jew Monika Polit, who wrote that Rumkowski was a German victim, not their collaborator # . This poor ghetto king.
Info from yesterday’s entry:
On the wiki, Chaim Rumkowski is no longer a Jew, he is not a Zionist activist, he is Polish.
Because he cooperated with the Germans, pardon: Nazis.
So he couldn’t be a Jew.
Jews did not collaborate.
The case was reported by a Twitter user @ Wikipedia : https://twitter.com/Wikipedysta/status/1129481479027875840. Be the first to write about this @ duzy_mietek : https://twitter.com/duzy _mietek / status / 1129413941787074561
The behavior of the Wikipedia administrator was so rude that it was not enough that he deleted the record that Rumkowski was a Jew, and in addition blocked the editing of this part of the entry.
It was announced that “the new history of World War II” was written and this can also be seen on English Wikipedia
Chaim Rumkowski, after 14 years of password on the Wiki, from a Polish Jew, on May 1, 2019, he became a Pole [!]
One of the first Wiki admins has made the change and is guarding the password (since 2004)
The attempt to restore the record that Rumkowski was a Jew ended in blocking the entry due to vandalism.
Jayg – a Jewish censor from Wikipedia
The Jewish censor on Wikipedia turns out to be Jayg – an admin who has been working on the wiki for over 15 years, and who, in many English-language entries about Jews from Poland, remarks that they were Jews.
As another user of Twitter @ OperatorpUga # pointed out, in one day he deprived Jewish roots of many other Jews collaborating with Germany during WWII.
In turn, @ KominiarzEU wrote:
Reading the corrections of “deserved editor” Jayjga is really fascinating
Censors from Mysia could learn from him.
Another interesting fact is, for example, the English-language slogan on the History of Jews in Poland. According to Wikipedia, the history of Jews in Poland dates back to over 1,000 years.
I encourage you to discuss here as well as on Wikipedia under the tweet:
Zapowiedziano pisano "nowej historii II wojny" i widać to też na angielskiej Wikipedii
Chaim Rumkowski po 14 latach hasła na Wiki, z polskiego Żyda, 1 maja 2019, stał się Polakiem[!]
A zamiany dokonał, i hasła pilnuje, jeden z pierwszych adminów Wiki (na stanowisku już od 2004) pic.twitter.com/USmlHUwoiX
— Wikipedysta (@Wikipedysta) May 17, 2019
It turns out that the global campaign of slandering Poland and assigning us faults for WWII and hypocrisy of history is going to a higher level. Our role is to keep an eye on passwords, especially foreign ones. The next installment of washing the wines of Jews collaborating and exposing their brethren to Germany, the Germans who cooked hell not only on Polish soil, will be rewriting slogans in which the main perpetrators, and maybe even the only culprits will be Poles. It is comforting that hypocrisy of Polish passwords will not pass so quickly.
PS At present, Chaim Rumkowski’s slogan in the English version contains information that he was a Jew.
“When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable buildups, as fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of antifascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them.”
The Disputation of Paris (Hebrew: משפט פריז Mishpat Pariz, French: Disputation de Paris), also known as the Trial of the Talmud (French: Procès du Talmud), took place in 1240 at the court of the King Louis IX of France. It followed the work of Nicholas Donin, a Jewish convert to Christianity who translated the Talmud and pressed 35 charges against it to Pope Gregory IX by quoting a series of allegedly blasphemous passages about Jesus, Mary, or Christianity. Four rabbis defended the Talmud against Donin’s accusations.
The 2001 Mexican legislative assembly attack began around 5pm on 10 October. Two armed Israelis, Saar Noam Ben Zvi and Salvador Gersson Smeck (a suspected Mossad agent) carrying Pakistani passports were arrested in the Mexican Legislative assembly. The attack was widely but only briefly reported on Mexican TV and in local newspapers. It was reported in Pravda on 13 October 2001 but appears to have been subject to a news blackout as it was covered scarcely if at all by Western commercially-controlled media. After “the Israeli Embassy used heavy handed measures to have the two Israelis released”, they were indeed released without charge.
The Western corporate media may have almost completely failed to report this story. It was reported but dismissed (on grounds of “anti-semitism” by USAJewish.com). CNN may have published a short report. However, Pravda published the following story on October 13, 2001 (saved at archive.org and archive.is)
Mostly about population estimates of Pre-Columbian North America, and how the rate of decline does not imply anything commonly considered a “genocide”, and a rant at the end about when there are undeniable objective outcomes, the traditional heuristics of expertise vanish.
“A ‘Continuous Spree’of Rape and Robbery.” And Torture and Murder
The Cheka official quoted by Pipes above said the early days in Kiev (1918–1919) amounted to a “continuous spree” of rape and robbery, though they were “careful to spare fellow Jews.” For some reason, Pipes left out mention of horrific torture and murder, but I’ll fill in those details. A major element of revenge has always been humiliation of the target group and rape of its women, and the Red Terror had plenty of both. The acme of vengeance, for the truly dedicated, is torture and murder: the infliction of terrible suffering directly on the object of hatred, flaunting one’s dominance, then the total destruction of the victim. The frenzied nature of the excesses of the Red Terror resulted from a combination of factors, including an atmosphere of brutalization brought on by revolution and civil war and a perverse ideology, but an ethnic factor was also clearly present.
A recent historian of Stalin’s executioners affirms the Jews “ruthlessly avenged the victims of a century’s pogroms.” Another states that “the “ranks of the Cheka were filled with social elements anxious for revenge.” A historian of the Russian Civil War states, “Always anxious to use national and racial hatreds to advantage, Dzerzhinskii placed Jews in seven of the Cheka’s top ten positions. . . . The victims of centuries of anti-Semitic abuse, the Jews of the Ukraine now had a chance to take revenge.”
The Cheka officers, with literally nothing hindering their action, assaulted women on a mass scale. There is plenty of evidence for this.
“Convicted criminals and certified psychopaths appointed themselves officers of the Cheka and terrorized, raped, and murdered whom they liked.” “Rapes of female prisoners by Cheka guards and interrogators were so commonplace that they occasioned comment from superiors only if performed in some particularly brutal or perverted fashion.” Rape of Russian women by Cheka men “took on gigantic proportions, particularly in the second reconquest of Ukraine and the Cossack regions of the Crimea in 1920.”
Sergey Melgounov wrote the classic account of early Bolshevik rule, The Red Terror. On page 136 he describes Cheka “food detachments” that plundered the food in the countryside to feed the cities, the base of Bolshevik power: “Whenever an expedition that was collecting the grain tax in the Khvalinsky district reached a village the peasants were commanded to surrender their best-looking girls to the officials.”
A story from Ekaterinodar in the Caucasus, c. 1919:
Madame Dombrovskaya, an ex-school teacher, was tortured in her solitary confinement cell . . . . The Che-Ka had been informed that she had . . . jewelery . . . in her keeping: wherefore . . . she was ordered to be tortured until she should reveal where the jewelery might be. For a beginning she was raped and outraged generally—the raping taking place in order of seniority of torturers, with a man called Friedmann raping her first, and the others in regular sequence. And, that done, she was questioned further as to the whereabouts of the jewelery, and further tortured by having incisions made into her body, and her finger tips nipped with pliers and pincers. Until at last, in her agony, with the blood pouring from her wounds, she confessed that the jewels were hidden in an outbuilding of her house. The same evening (the date being November 6) she was shot.
From southern Ukraine: “a witness testified before the Denikin Commission [an investigative body set up by the White Armies] that licentious orgies had been carried out systematically by the Che-Ka and tribunal of Nikolaev, and included even women who had come to beg for relatives’ release, with that inclusion as the price of their relatives’ freedom.”
Some local Chekas were so atrocious that even Bolsheviks were outraged. One—a Serafina Gopner—complained to Lenin about the Cheka in Ekaterinoslav in Ukraine:
This organization is rotten to the core: the canker of criminality, violence, and totally arbitrary decisions abounds, and it is filled with . . . the dregs of society, men armed to the teeth who simply execute anyone they don’t like. They steal, loot, rape, and throw anyone into prison, forge documents, practice extortion and blackmail, and will let anyone go in exchange for huge sums of money.
General Patton commented extensively on the cruelty and dishonesty of the Soviet Union after WWII
(There’s a theory that was assassinanted for his outspokeness.)
Patton said to Secretary of War Patterson: “Let’s keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect.”
Patterson replied, “Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture.”
“I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof — that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!”
He noted in his diary on May 14:
“I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few exceptions, give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits.”
And Patton’s aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14: “Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of virility and cruelty.”
On May 18 he noted in his diary:
“In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.”
Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: “If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger.”
“these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor.”
He described in his diary one DP camp,
“where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared — not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe — lost to all decency.”
His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
“This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it.”
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:
“Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is — not intended for the individual but for the race.
Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.”
he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany’s economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote:
“I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are being blown up — that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war — can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons.”
Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution of every German who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:
“I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union’s Gulags), where many will be starved to death.”
In another letter to his wife he commented:
“I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”
And in his diary he noted:,
“Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles.”
After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: “Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It’s said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed.”
His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: “It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country — and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism.”
On August 31 he wrote: “Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans.” And on September 2: “What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole.”
In his diary that night lie wrote:
“There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs.
“They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law . . .
“Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP’s, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because the answer is that, in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid we have waited too long.”
And in a letter of the same date to his wife: “I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in catching Nazis. I can’t tell them the truth that unless we restore Germany we will insure that communism takes America.”
Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and “kick him upstairs” as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because “I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe.”
On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States. In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower’s pusillanimous behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things were causing.
He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America’s enemies:
“I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every other commander. In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders, because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do.”
In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America’s future by not opposing the growing Soviet might:
“It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start an all-out offensive . . . .”
Rand Paul introduces his new amendment that moves money from areas he thinks is wasteful to American taxpayers and move it into areas that will further Pandemic research.